Bits Journal #1

Alrighty, let's talk about some random news in this first exciting Bits Journal article here at PM's Music World. First up, Vevo.

OK Vevo is up first. Now, it seems that Vevo will be doing a Vevo Certified SuperFan Fest. So according to Vevo, Vevo Certified SuperFan Fest was announced on September 8 and it seems that Iggy Azalea and Demi Lovato to headline Vevo Certified SuperFan Fest. That's right, these two hot millennial chicks born in the early 90s will be performing at the Vevo Certified SuperFan Fest. So it seems that Iggy Azalea and Demi Lovato will be at the Vevo Certified: SuperFan Fest on October 8. This event will take place at The Barker Hangar in Santa Monica. This concert will be filmed and fans from around the world will be able to watch it beginning October 16. Sounds interesting. Huh?

So according to Vevo, it appears that when an artist gets certified on Vevo it means their music videos exceed over 100 million views. This concert series is for artists to perform and thank their fans for watching their music videos. In the issued press release Vevo's Senior Vice President Doug McVehil said, "Because a video would never reach 100 million views without the fans, certified salutes the audience as much as it honors music videos and the artists who made them." So let's hope Taylor Swift's country music videos like Begin Again music video gets to be certified one day or even right now. Who am I kidding? OK, let's continue.

Australian rapper Iggy Azalea hit it big in the states with her hilarious 2014 single Fancy. The music video for that song has been viewed over 260 million times. She continued her success with a feature on Ariana Grande's single Problem. Ariana Grande is pretty hot. Let's continue. That music video has been viewed over 180 million times. Man, she's hot. Especially her nice soft butt. No matter why I think Iggy Azalea is hot. OK, let's move on to Demi Lovato.

American actress and singer Demi Lovato hit mainstream success with her 2011 album Unbroken. The second single from that album was Give Your Heart a Break, Demi Lovato's first number 1 single, and the official music video has been watched over 150 million times. She managed to top that in 2013 with the music video for her single Heart Attack, her second number 1 single, which has been watched over 240 million times. As with Iggy Azalea, Demi Lovato is hot. Why? Because she's hot. She had a nice butt. Yeah, tap that butt, Demi. I want to see her shaking her butt. Anyway, I loved her music because she doesn't like feeling sexy and her music is actually based on her personal life. Just like Kelly Clarkson, Taylor Swift and Colbie Caillat did. OK, that's it for this section. Let's move on.

It seems that Jay Z and Beyonce is working on a collaboration album for next year. Pretty interesting. I really like how Jay Z and Beyonce has stay together since 2002 when they release their first single in the Jay Z and Beyonce era called 03 Bonnie & Clyde.

While Jay Z happens to be one of the most legendary rappers in the nation behind Eminem, Beyonce is pretty hot. I mean, look how hot Beyonce is. OK, enough with the "she's hot" talk. Sorry about that. It seems that I like to say "hot" to women like Alicia Keys because female artists like Rihanna is hot. I'm just saying. Let's continue. Ever since Beyonce started her music career with Destiny's Child in 1997, Beyonce is going pretty strong thanks to Destiny's Child's smash hit singles like Survivor and her awesome number 1 singles like Single Ladies (Put A Ring On It). OK, next up another music news.

It appears that Billboard will be working on a new chart called Consumption Chart. What appears is that the music business is bracing itself in anticipation of the so-called consumption chart Billboard and SoundScan are jointly creating, with endless questions about how said chart will impact and possibly alter their marketing methodologies according to CHARTOLOGY. The weekly chart will combine album and track sales with audio and video streams, assigning an equivalent-album value to each, as in the TEA metric, theoretically providing a more accurate and comprehensive representation of modern-day music consumption. It’s expected to make its debut the first week of January, or as close to it as possible, so that the full year can be measured in this new way, with year-to-date totals accompanying the weekly figures. That time frame also gives the two companies time to get their systems in place; for now, streaming is being measured by hand, a dauntingly labor-intensive task. Billboard’s album sales chart will remain in place, but most observers believe it will take on decreasing importance over time as the business acclimates itself to the new system.

In some respects, the consumption chart will mirror the present sales charts in that sales and streaming tend to correlate, with certain exceptions. For example, Cherrytree/Interscope’s Disclosure album Settle, released in 2013, continues to generate a high volume of YouTube views and audio streams on Spotify and elsewhere, but sales have yet to follow suit; U.S. sales are at 125k. "Latch" is doing considerably better with 1.7m, but Sam Smith’s vocal has been a key factor in the single’s success. In a mock-up of last week’s consumption chart, the Disclosure album, which　placed #213 in pure sales with a modest 1.8k, vaults to #64 with a total album equivalent of 8.9k, thanks to 3.3m streams and 48k sales of "Latch." An even more dramatic example is Tove Lo’s debut EP Truth Serum on Island, which is #302 in album sales but has a total consumption rank of #48, the result of 4.3m streams and 64k singles sales on "Habits (Stay High)."

Overall, the most dramatic effect of the consumption chart will be to lengthen the tails of bona fide hits by measuring their aftermarket impact, potentially providing the labels with additional time in which to market these hits. Katy Perry’s Prism (Capitol), for example, moves up 45 slots from its pure sales ranking　of #61 to #16, while Jason Derulo’s Talk Dirty (WB) goes #82-22.

Among the myriad questions being asked around the business, perhaps the most common is, will people still care about pure sales charts once the consumption chart is established as the standard? More intriguingly, in what ways will attempts be made to manipulate the new chart, and what new games will labels play in order to get a leg up on the competition? Will the consumption chart mean the end of the SoundScan-era emphasis on the first week of release, or will the majors figure out new ways to max out that total?

Sounds interesting. That would be perfect for Taylor Swift or Avril Lavigne because the former needs to get her country music appearing on the mainstream thanks to the rise of steaming while the latter needs better marketing now that streaming is on the rise instead of bratty songs like What The Hell and post 2002 songs from 2004-today like My Happy Ending. Let's hope we don't want today's awful music like Justin Bieber shows up.

Well it appears that according to America, it seems that 1994 is the peak of America's greatness for America's music. What the fart? I mean, there are great music from 1995-2014 like Christina Aguilera and Katy Perry. So how about no. Let's continue.

Then 1995 came in and start ruining America by putting in 1995-present America that can easily damage late 90s and early 2000s like Spice Girls. This cause America to bash 1995-present music like Backstreet Boys. So music put in crud like NSync instead of something good like Avril Lavigne. This can damage late 90s and early 2000s artists like Kelly Clarkson.

Good thing it didn't damage 2004-2012 generation artists that much like Taylor Swift. OK, let continue this subject.

Then after the early 2000s ended in 2003, 2004 came in and start allowing the new millennium to control too much power over America causing America to damage 2004 onwards outputs like Rihanna causing the new millennium strongly damage the "America is going strong" status. Thus, America is broken thanks to 1995 or later that can easily ruined America's music like Miley Cyrus. It appears that America music prefers America's music from 1994 or before 1994 like 80s music over 1995-today music like Pink and Taylor Swift. (I actually prefer the post early 90s America songs of the 1995-2007 era to the America music from 1994 or before 1994, but that's for another day).

Will 2015 and later came in and save the entire music industry by putting in music which we listened on the internet like Vevo? Or, 2015-future music will might become the post 1994 music causing next year's music to act like post 1994 music. We don't want this generation's music to act like post 1994 music and prefer music before 1995. Only time will tell.

OK, that's it for this article.

What do you think? Are you exciting to see Iggy Azalea and Demi Lovato performing Vevo Certified SuperFan Fest on October 8 and then fans watch it on October 16 on Vevo? Do you think Jay Z and Beyonce collaborating their first crossover album for next year? Do you think the new Billboard Consumption Chart will effect streaming music as well as effecting the album sales? Sound off below!

Why Can’t Avril Lavigne Be A Major Music Icon?

In my last articles, I talked about why Avril Lavigne needs to make an album without any bratty songs for next year and why Avril Lavigne needs to resign Sony Music Entertainment and moved to Universal Music Records.

As you may know that Avril Lavigne has dominated the music department in 2002 with Let Go and its 3 number 1 singles, Complicated, Sk8er Boi and I’m With You. Plus, Losing Grip with is her most serious song of all her Let Go era songs even though Losing Grip doesn’t do great in the charts and the music video released on the awful 2003 date instead of a very good fall 2002 date. But hey, Losing Grip works well as a late Let Go single since general public has no faith on Losing Grip.

Flash forward to today where Avril Lavigne spawned 5 albums including Let Go which I mentioned earlier. With more than 41 million albums sold worldwide since 2002, as of today, Avril Lavigne is considered a fan favorite artist.

However, Avril Lavigne is a tough artist to sell in the music public. You see, America is a very tough place for Avril Lavigne and her music since America has no faith on Avril Lavigne and her music like Girlfriend. Complicated was very lucky though since Complicated is the most listened Avril Lavigne song in the public even by today’s standards as well as her debut album, Let Go sold more than 6 million copies in the US as of today (great album by the way). Plus, her most successful song of all time since 2007, Girlfriend, Avril Lavigne’s lead single off of her third album, The Best Damn Thing. There’s also Sk8er Boi from 2002 since this song was her second number 1 single as well as becoming a big hit song during fall 2002 along with other great songs from 2002 like Kelly Clarkson’s A Moment Like This. I’m With You is without a doubt the best Avril Lavigne single by public standards and even her fans’ standards. It even got a 2004 Grammy nomination but lost to Christina Aguilera’s Beautiful. Let’s not forget Arista who did a wonderful job making this fabulous album which is Let Go in 2002.

So Avril Lavigne’s plan was to move away from the dominating early 2000s music formula by the end 2003. The next line-up of her albums wouldn’t be early 2000s music starting with her second album, Under My Skin. Under My Skin which is her sophomore album is the album that fans loved the most thanks to her brilliant songs from that album like He Wasn’t. Plus, her third album, The Best Damn Thing is where she gets to go back to making her hilarious bratty punk rock songs like Hot in 2007 since we have Girlfriend as I mentioned earlier. Girlfriend topped the Hot 100 chart in 2007 and sold more than 3 million digital copies in the US. Then she will be working on her fourth album, Goodbye Lullaby where she gets to work with Max Martin and work on her powerful pop rock mature materials like Wish You Were Here. After that, her fifth album brought us her really funny bratty pop anthem comebacks like here’s To Never Growing Up and Rock N Roll along with her first collabo single called Let Me Go featuring Nickelback’s Chad Kroeger since he and Avril Lavigne was married last year as well as other exciting fifth album surprises that will make her fifth album the most diverse album yet…

Unfortunately, the plan didn’t quite work out. By 2004, Sony Music Entertainment and RCA (for Under My Skin, The Best Damn Thing and Goodbye Lullaby) had put many executives in charge of Avril Lavigne causing Avril Lavigne to move away from Arista during that same year and Arista lost Avril Lavigne and her second album, Under My Skin which Arista and Avril Lavigne has been worked on since 2003. Many of them were biased against Avril Lavigne and saw her as an artist that Sony and RCA wants to forget about causing Avril Lavigne songs only appeal early 2000s music and not her entire music industry in general like 2010’s Alice and Sony Music only wants big names like Britney Spears and RCA like Kelly Clarkson, rather than a Canadian artist that makes wonderful pop rock music since early 2000s that other artists like Taylor Swift couldn’t. As a result, Avril Lavigne’s music environment became worse and worse, and Avril Lavigne’s post Let Go era materials in general like Goodbye Lullaby took a hit…

Her second album, Under My Skin is a huge mess in 2004 despite the album sold more than 3 million copies in the US and fans loved the album and RCA killed Under My Skin by putting in alot of post 2002 materials like Don't Tell Me causing Under My Skin to lose her sophomore outputs 10 year ago. General public like MTV along with the internet has no interest to that album either and her last Under My Skin music video for He Wasn't only released in the UK in 2005.

Her third album, The Best Damn Thing, lost Avril Lavigne fans after bashing her very funny song Girlfriend came out in 2007 as well as her ballads like When You're Gone that can easily damage her third album in 2007.

Then Goodbye Lullaby sold poorly 3 years ago after RCA pushed back that album several times causing her fourth album to release on the awful 2011 date and lost her number 1 2011 singles fast before RCA threw Avril Lavigne out the window.

Then Epic Records picked her up and her fifth album was killed by Epic Records's executives by changing her last year's album's date 3 times causing Here's To Never Growing Up, Rock N Roll and Let Me Go to lose her real comeback last year. Worse, Epic Records put the awful November date for going up against a new Eminem album and a very bad Hello Kitty song on her fifth album and her fifth album lost Avril Lavigne's money and Epic Records's money at the same time. That's why Epic Records has to get rid of Avril Lavigne and Sony Music's staff will fire her forever because Sony Music can't stand Avril Lavigne and Sony only wants big names like Beyonce and RCA like Miley Cyrus.

Avril Lavigne’s 2004-2014 era has now become the Avril Lavigne songs after 2002 like Girlfriend is not popular era post-2002.

Avril Lavigne’s tenure was ambitious, but ruined by Sony Music’s executive interference and the aggressive “I hate Avril Lavigne-ification” of Avril Lavigne as a whole. Avril Lavigne was no longer that Canadian maker of fine pop rock music for everyone; she was now a “bratty punk rock songs” empire. Why can't Avril Lavigne songs keeps getting better anymore? Now the only way is inventions. Even the internet like Vevo couldn't save Avril Lavigne's publicity from that dreadful Sony Music. I mean, why can't people listen to music on the internet is what music sells? I'm tired of publicity is what music sells. Publicity like twerking ruined music is huge in America appearance. People listening to music on the internet like YouTube and Spotify should've dominate the music industry. Blast you, America's music publicity.

It seems that there are some facts about the Goodbye Lullaby era and the self-titled fifth album era since 2010s decade has ruined Avril Lavigne’s 2010s outputs for some reason thanks to bratty songs like What The Hell for ruining Avril Lavigne's comeback. Take a look.

You see, Goodbye Lullaby was pushed back a few times due to different reasons. There was a rumoured date around November 2009, but since she got divorced, she “disappeared”, made more songs (Remember When, Goodbye, Not Enough) about the breakup and she was ready to release it in June 2010, with the first single being released in April. But RCA sent her to Sweden to work with Max Martin because there wasn’t a “hit material”.

In summer 2010, she worked with Alex Da Kid and Skylar Grey (she posted a video about it), and there was rumours that she was working with Pharrell Williams and some other rapper. She disappeared for some extra months and in fall 2010 she release a blog entry where she explained what happened. She only used Max Martin songs from those “summer sessions” and being 4 out of 13/14, but being used as singles.

Then after Goodbye Lullaby tanked the charts after releasing it on an awful 2011 date instead of the 2010 date that Goodbye Lullaby should’ve been released on, she confirmed that she had finished the album around after working with The Runners a few months (late 2011, early 2012) and a few weeks with Chad and David (the Tripod) in February-March 2012, and then she went to France. After that, she went back to studio with the Tripod team and the album was confirmed to be finished in fall 2012, even by L.A. Ried himself.

But in January 2013, she went to work with “other guys” like Martin Johnson, J-Kash or Matt Squire. Then at least half the album was changed and we know the self-titled fifth album as it is.

I understand why music listeners are very proud of other artists that are better than Avril Lavigne like Taylor Swift based on the works for the general public and majors A-List artists like Katy Perry because unlike Avril Lavigne, other artists are not spoiled brat and treat their music very well. Avril Lavigne doesn't. That’s why other artists are doing better than Avril Lavigne even in the mid to late 2000s. That’s why her public image is a spoiled brat. Bu the problem is that Avril Lavigne is shy, not a spoiled brat. The reason she makes bratty songs is that she is shy, not a spoiled brat. So unfortunately, they never realize how many songs which are better than today’s popular music like Miley Cyrus are usually banned and aren't considered as singles, that is why people haven't got noticed other amazing songs out of every single album from 2004-today which includes Slipped Away and Fall To Pieces from Under My Skin; Innocence, One Of Those Girls, Contagious, Runaway from The Best Damn Thing; Darlin, Remember When, Not Enough from Goodbye Lullaby; Give You What You Like, Falling Fast, 17 from her fifth album. All we could blame is the label they made bad single decision to the singles. Yet, other artists like Sia has been free to choose what the singles she exactly wants. It looks like Sony Music will have to forget about Avril Lavigne and only wants big names and RCA. Universal Records did that and so does EMI Records. Why Avril Lavigne won’t so the same thing? I mean, Sony Music needs to stop marketing big names and RCA and market Sony Music in general like Arista and Carrie Underwood.

Don't ever say Avril Lavigne writing in worse coz I'm sure she's been skilled, just listening to Remember When, Darlin, Stop Standing There, Falling Fast, those single-worthy tracks. However, her label just screw all of them, it doesn't mean those songs not existed.

For the materials wrote for other pop singers, I know Sia is professional at it, at the same time, I believe Avril Lavigne could handle that job perfectly. The production idea of How You Remind Me was from Avril Lavigne. A person could think of that way to recreate a song to be such matched with the vibe itself and surprising, not got to the negative to the job. Remember, Avril Lavigne just doesn't want to write songs for others, it doesn't mean that she can't. When she promise to do that, it usually turns out great as Alice, Keep Holding On and Let Go singles like Losing Grip.

So it seems that RCA and Epic Records made a bad single decision to the 2004-2011 singles and the 2013 singles respectively because RCA and Epic Records just screw all Avril Lavigne singles after the Let Go era. This caused Sony's music label to damage her post 2002 singles in general like He Wasn't and Girlfriend and lose her number 1 singles like My Happy Ending.

Worse, she makes bratty songs-less singles. I hate bratty songs-less Avril Lavigne singles like Nobody's Home. I can't stand bratty songs-less Avril Lavigne singles like My Happy Ending. Bratty songs-less Avril Lavigne singles like When You're Gone ruined Avril Lavigne. Her bratty songs-less singles like Wish You Were Here are far worse than her bratty singles like The Best Damn Thing. I'm glad I'm sticking with I'm With You. Stupid bratty songs-less Avril Lavigne singles.

That's it. Avril Lavigne needs to move out of Sony because she got out of RCA 3 years ago after Wish You Were Here flunked at the Billboard charts.

All I can't say is, f(bleep) you, RCA. F(bleep) you, Sony Music Entertainment. F(bleep) you, bratty songs. F(bleep) you, Epic Records. F(bleep) you, 2004-present era. F(bleep) you, Avril Lavigne songs after Let Go. You all ruined this fabulous Canadian punk rock single who started with Complicated in 2002 and people fell in love with her. Why can't Avril Lavigne be a major Canadian music icon? Why can't people have specialness to Avril Lavigne?

Will Sony and Epic Records remove Avril Lavigne for good? Will Avril Lavigne ever gonna make an album with no bratty songs for next year? Will she moved to Universal Records and save her career? Can Avril Lavigne finally stopped making bratty songs and try something new each time as she turns 30? Can other artists like Demi Lovato save Avril Lavigne from the dreadful Sony Music? Will Avril Lavigne ever gonna get her number 1 singles back?

We can only hope...

Taylor Swift Has Unleashed Bad Blood

Hey, Swifites. I hope you enjoy my new music blog. Now, I’ll be talking about the next Taylor Swift song off of her fifth album, 1989, called Bad Blood. But, before I discuss this one, I’ll be talking about Taylor Swift finally getting her first pop album.

I’m officially exciting for 1989 because 1989 will be her first pop album and her first album without any country music. This might be crazy. I mean, I loved Taylor Swift’s first 3 albums from 2006-2010. Her first 3 albums were great, from the beginning of her career with Tim McGraw in 2006 all the way to her sophomore album Fearless and her 2 number 1 crossover singles, Love Story and You Belong With Me. Then she’s getting back to country with her third album, Speak Now, in 2010, now that pop music has moved on to Katy Perry and Miley Cyrus in 2010 causing country music to reunite with Taylor Swift with Mine, Back To December, Mean, Sparks Fly and Ours. Plus, her underrated Speak Now pop song, The Story Of Us. Anyway, Speak Now sold more than 1 million copies in the US in 2010, but pop music industry has lost interest to Taylor Swift in 2010 after pop music has zero interest to Mine and Back To December. Speak Now is officially a fan favorite hit album because fans loved this amazing album. Speak Now ftw. Until 2012 came in.

That’s where Max Martin came in and lost Taylor Swift’s country music by putting in more pop songs (We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together, I Knew You Were Trouble and 22) and destroying her country music and her country album, Red. Worse, country music doesn’t care about the Red era and only wants other country music outputs like George Strait and Luke Bryan. That means, Red is stuck on pop, nothing but pop. No country. The only Red country songs is Begin Again and Red and country music hated Begin Again and Red. Then it got ugly, Taylor Swift chose 1 of her 3 Max Martin pop songs for crossover when played on country radio and thus We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together was chosen as a pop song with a crossover appeal for country radio. That means, We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together have ruined Taylor Swift playing her country songs on country radio like Tim McGraw and Sparks Fly. Good thing I Knew You Were Trouble and 22 avoid country asap. Now Taylor Swift will have to carry over her country songs like Mean and Ours to pop stations. Even the success of Tim McGraw’s number 1 2013 country single, Highway Don’t Care, couldn’t save Taylor Swift’s country industry last year. It look like this might be the end of Taylor Swift’s country music as country music has moved on to other outputs like Brad Paisley. Ditto Carrie Underwood.

You see, 2012 and 2013 were dark years for Taylor Swift’s country music. 2006-2011 were great years for her country career for the most part. Will Taylor Swift even gonna move her country music to pop stations after Taylor Swift lost her country music? Is there a solution for Taylor Swift to make an album without any country music? Is this the end of country Taylor Swift? It looks like Taylor Swift is gonna lose her country music forever and country music has no interest to Taylor Swift. Who will save Taylor Swift’s country music department?

Don’t worry, just ask her fifth album, 1989. With 1989 announced last month on the 18th at Yahoo, this will be the first ever Taylor Swift album without any country tracks and her first album where none of her songs she wrote about boys. It will also allow Taylor Swift to have her country music carried over to her pop stations. But how? Her lead single off of 1989 called Shake It Off is here to help. This hilarious Taylor Swift song can save not only Taylor Swift’s pop music industry from the dreadful Red era and its overrated singles, We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together and I Knew You Were Trouble (22 is now a fan favorite Taylor Swift song despite produced by Max Martin since I really like that song) but it will allow Taylor Swift to stop writing songs about boys and have the ability to play her country songs like Picture To Burn on pop radio when 1989 becomes another success.

Anyway, Shake It Off was her second number 1 hit on the Hot 100 chart and her first number 1 single since I Knew You Were Trouble and it peaked at number 1 on Fuse Top 20 Countdown for 2 weeks in a row. Crazy for a Taylor Swift single. Shake It Off was also performed at the 2014 MTV Video Music Awards where Beyonce was held.

Now with the hilarious Shake It Off becoming a new success for Taylor Swift along with her hopefully upcoming song called Bad Blood, Taylor Swift is not only an official pop star, but it will help Taylor Swift to allow her country music to be played on pop radio as long as Taylor Swift will no longer play her country music on country radio.

OK, without further ado, let’s talk about the Rolling Stone revealing Taylor Swift’s Bad Blood. But first, the cover.

Now let’s take a look at Taylor Swift’s Rolling Stone cover it appears that Taylor Swift looks hot in this cover. I mean, Taylor Swift is hot. Especially her sexy butt. That’s because Taylor Swift is hot. Why? Because she’s hot. That’s why. Well come to think of it. Taylor Swift is hot on her incredible music videos. I mean, look how hot Taylor Swift is on her music videos. Let’s think of this way. Taylor Swift is hot on her Mine music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her I Knew You Were Trouble music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her 22 music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her Begin Again music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her Tim McGraw music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her Ours music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her Our Song music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her Love Story music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her Mean music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her The Story Of Us music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her Sparks Fly music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her You Belong With Me music video, Taylor Swift is hot on her Picture To Burn music video and Taylor Swift is hot on her infamous Shake It Off music video. On her Fifteen music video, her friend Abigail Anderson was pretty hot. That’s another reason Taylor Swift is hot. Keep in mind that Taylor Swift doesn’t like feeling sexy or dance moves. She has to act mature even when she’s hot. OK, enough with the chit chat on why I think Taylor Swift is hot. Let’s move on.

Now, according to Rolling Stone’s 1218th issue, it appears that Taylor Swift reveals her song Bad Blood from her upcoming first pop album 1989 is not about a guy, but rather an unidentified female artist, who tried to sabotage one of her tours. It looks like Taylor Swift gonna write songs about girls this time. Plus, I'm really exciting for Taylor Swift gets to write song about girls. With Bad Blood announced, it appears that Taylor Swift’s 1989 singles might follow her Red singles’ footsteps. Let’s think of it, Shake It Off follows We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together’s footsteps and Bad Blood follows I Knew You Were Trouble’s footsteps. Duh. Also, for my suggestion, it appears that Bad Blood might gonna be a rock single with a crossover appeal for pop since 1989 will be her debut pop single. So if Bad Blood is a rock song, not a pop song, then it can pull off Limp Bizkit’s Nookie, Nickelback’s How You Remind Me, Linkin Park’s Papercut or even Avril Lavigne’s Sk8er Boi. So if Bad Blood is a rock single, then I appreciate Taylor Swift for tackling new genres like hip-hop because Taylor Swift gets to tackle new genres besides country and pop. Now, here’s what Taylor Swift has to say about Bad Blood.

“For years, I was never sure if we were friends or not,” she tells the magazine. “She would come up to me at awards shows and say something and walk away, and I would think, ‘Are we friends, or did she just give me the harshest insult of my life?’”

Taylor Swift continues, “Then last year, the other star crossed a line. “She did something so horrible, I was like, ‘Oh, we’re just straight-up enemies.’ And it wasn’t even about a guy!”

“It had to do with business,” Taylor Swift elaborates. “She basically tried to sabotage an entire arena tour. She tried to hire a bunch of people out from under me.”

The Shake It Off singer explains, “I’m surprisingly non-confrontational — you would not believe how much I hate conflict. So now I have to avoid her. It’s awkward, and I don’t like it.”

Thanks, Taylor. Now according to Huffington Post, it appears that “Why The Internet Thinks Taylor Swift's Song 'Bad Blood' Is About Katy Perry” and speaking of Katy Perry, it appears that “Ain't no drama like T. Swift drama cause the T. Swift drama don't stop.”

Anyway, it seems that although everyone from Miley Cyrus to Carrie Underwood is considered a possible frenemy, the World Wide Web seems to focus its investigation on one prime suspect: Katy Perry.

I mean, Katy Perry? I thought Katy Perry and Taylor Swift were friends. Let’s continue.

It appears that Taylor Swift already ruled that issue out.

"And it wasn't even about a guy!" she told Rolling Stone. "It had to do with business. She basically tried to sabotage an entire arena tour. She tried to hire a bunch of people out from under me."

Hmmm. Others have pointed out that, according to an article in the Examiner from December 2013, three of Taylor Swift's backup dancers left mid-tour to join Katy Perry's troupe.

"I was with Taylor for the first six months,'' backup dancer John Brownlie told the Examiner. "It was a great experience and she's a great person to work with, but then Katy contacted us.''

Brownlie, who had previously toured with Katy Perry on her California Dreams world tour, told the Examiner, "Obviously we were with Katy for two and a half years. She's like family to us, so we were, like, 'absolutely.'"

"We weren't really dancing in Taylor's tour anyway so I had got a little bored and I really wanted to do a promo tour,'' he added.

Interesting, very interesting.

Perhaps the most dreadful piece of evidence in the Swift v. Perry case is a tweet that suggests even Katy Perry thinks "Bad Blood" is about Katy Perry:

“Watch out for the Regina George in sheep's clothing...” – from Katy Perry’s Twitter account

... And also proves that Katy Perry likes making Mean Girls references. Woo!

Still, rumors are rumors, and until Ms. Swift comes out and dedicates her song to Miss Perry, the jury is out on this one. Good one, Huffington Post.

I'm ready for Bad Blood this year because Bad Blood will be her angry single. But I don't think it has to do with Katy Perry. Neither is Demi Lovato, Avril Lavigne, Carrie Underwood, or Selena Gomez. I bet it has to do with Miley Cyrus because Miley Cyrus is twerking alot since that awful We Can't Stop Came Out destroying Avril Lavigne's hilarious top 20 hit single, Here's To Never Growing Up causing the entire music industry to unable to hear Avril Lavigne anymore including her more meaningful ballads and moved on. I bet America is ruining Avril Lavigne since 2004 by putting in Sony Music and RCA (2004-2011), not Avril Lavigne herself or her music. Let's continue.

1989 will be released on October 27 by Big Machine Records and it's the first Big Machine Records pop album. Let's hope Big Machine Records gets rid of country music like Rascal Flatts and moved to pop music like Christina Aguilera because Big Machine Records needs to be a pop label, not a country label. Big Machine Records needs pop music, not country music.

Anyway, I hope Bad Blood gets to be 1989's second single and if it do, it better have a music video this fall just in time for the launch of 1989. And, let's hope Taylor Swift gets to do her Bad Blood music video and her first MTV marathon where all her music videos was shown on MTV including all her country music videos.

"At a certain point," Taylor Swift told Rolling Stone in its new issue, "if you chase two rabbits, you lose them both." Does this mean, Taylor Swift will finally play all her country songs on pop music stations now that Taylor Swift finally has transitioned to pop next month? I hope so. Why? Because all Taylor Swift's country songs, crossover or not, needs to be shown on pop music stations like MTV. That includes Tim McGraw's Highway Don't Care.

So what do you think? Do you think that Bad Blood might has to do with Katy Perry over Miley Cyrus? Do you think Bad Blood could be about something else beside Katy Perry like Carrie Underwood? Would you like Bad Blood to be her next single with a music video? Do you think Bad Blood will do well on the Billboard charts allowing Taylor Swift to carry over the rest of her country music to pop stations besides crossovers? Sound off below!

I Hate Mainstream… Why Can’t Internet Save Publicity?

Hey guys, it’s me again. Just to let you know that I hate mainstream. Why? America. That’s why. America only want’s mainstream. Nothing but mainstream. That’s what America does and never stops. It’s been doing this since America went downhill and America only wants nothing but mainstreams and forget qualities and contents. I mean, why America hates qualities and contents and America only wants mainstreams and moneys? Let’s check it out why mainstream is ruining America’s successes in general.

For instance, Pokemon is way too mainstream back in 1998 and 1999 in the US when Pokemon first released in the US in 1998. Until then, Pokemon was just a fad in 1998-2000 thus ruining Pokemon is the second most successful franchise of all time. But look who saves Pokemon? That’s right, Pokemon Gold and Silver had save Pokemon from the evil mainstreams by the end of 2000 and thus Pokemon Gold and Silver was a huge success. So now that Pokemon is no longer mainstream and started to act like Pokemon, Pokemon Crystal-Pokemon Emerald will soon followed. Of course, the only time Pokemon was huge in America is 150 Pokemon and Pokemon Gold and Silver. Pokemon in general like Pokemon Ruby and Sapphire and Pokemon X and Y is not popular outside of Japan despite the games were very successful and this people have lost interest to Pokemon. It seems that America hates Pokemon like Pokemon FireRed and LeafGreen and Pokemon Black and White. Worse, America mainstream running gags like SpongeBob SquarePants and Cars came in and strongly destroys Pokemon’s America’s public like Pokemon HeartGold and SoulSilver causing Pokemon versions to release in North America every year since 2009 from Pokemon Platinum all the way to upcoming Pokemon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire. This makes America started to hates Pokemon after Crystal like Pokemon Diamond and Pearl causing Pokemon to lose Pokemon is going strong appearance and thus Pokemon will not be popular anymore. Even worldwide and internet doesn’t help either. Speaking of internet. I’ll be talking about it right now. OK, my Pokemon subject is done. Let’s move on to the internet.

As you may know that internet is the perfect time to gets its energy getting active between 1999 and 2003. Of course, 2001-2003 is a great time for my internet. I always though the internet will have a bright future in 1999-2003. But after 2003, the internet started to lose its identity in 2004 by putting in too many inappropriate contents like internet trolling causing the internet to lose its appropriate contents in general like Avril Lavigne. Speaking of Avril Lavigne. I’ll talk about Avril Lavigne’s struggles in music after the early 2000s.

As you may know that 2004-2013 is a very tough decade for Avril Lavigne. RCA lost Arista produced Under My Skin during 2004 causing Under My Skin lost its publicity. Under My Skin did peak at number 1 on Hot 200 Albums chart and My Happy Ending peaked at number 1 on Top 40 Mainstream Songs chart and played more than 80 times on the radio but without any promotion whatsoever. Because of this, My Happy Ending never caught on after wasting more than 80 million times played on the radio causing My Happy Ending to not have any public in 2004 because RCA compromised that song. Girlfriend did much better in 2007 though, but it did not make more airplays than My Happy Ending despite the song was played more than 80 million time and worse, lost so many fans. I bet RCA ruined Avril Lavigne. That’s why RCA will never want to work with Avril Lavigne again in 2011.

Then it got worse, after Avril Lavigne moved to Epic Records, she lost a lot of money because Sony did not make enough money to support Avril Lavigne. Even internet doesn’t help either. I mean, why can’t internet save Avril Lavigne’s publicity? Internet is the perfect time to save Avril Lavigne’s career by streaming her music like Here’s To Never Growing Up on something like Spotify, but general public blew it.

General public blew it again for not marketing her 2013 songs like Rock N Roll in 2013. Why 2013 music hates 2013 Avril Lavigne appearance like Let Me Go and only wants other 2013 music like We Can’t Stop? I bet money is the reason they want nothing but mainstream like One Direction and forget Avril Lavigne since 2004. Thus, Here’s To Never Growing Up, Rock N Roll and Let Me Go was slammed by number 1-less peaks in general and Epic Records. Epic Records has to get rid of Avril Laivgne forever and resign Sony Music because Sony Music can’t stand Avril Lavigne like What The Hell. I guess Sony Music only wants big names like Britney Spears and RCA like Miley Cyrus. If Universal Records picked up Avril Lavigne from Sony Music, then Avril Lavigne will now get her music promoted correctly from Universal just like Arista promoted the entire Let Go era correctly back in 2002. Let’s talk about why I think Let Me Go should get better promotion by clicking the link below. Trust me you will enjoy Let Me Go on Vevo.

http://www.vevo.com/watch/avril-lavigne/let-me-go/USSM21302141

Oh yeah, one more thing, Avril Lavigne needs to stop making bratty songs like Hello Kitty and move to rock music with a more mature route and very appropriate to everybody too. That way, Avril Lavigne will be popular again as long as she stopped making bratty music like Smile. OK, let's move on to why Internet needs to be shown in the public appropriately.

Now let’s talk about why I think the internet has to save to entire industry. To start things off, the internet needs to be shown in the public. Why? Because it needs to be shown in the public. The only time the internet was shown in the general public is Fuse showing Twitter’s tweets, streaming websites commercials like Hulu commercial and videos going viral on Good Morning America. So what the internet can do now in the public is to be shown in the general public appropriately. That’s right, the internet in general public has to be appropriate. Let’s see, Pokemon is appropriate, Nintendo is appropriate, hand-drawn animation is appropriate, Taylor Swift is appropriate, Mouse Trap is appropriate, Milton Bradley is appropriate, Captain Underpants is appropriate. Lol. Heck, even anime is somewhat appropriate as long as anime is appropriate. Pokemon is appropriate with children. So as long as people spent less time on the internet allowing the internet to handle its publicity on its own in the public, then it can save the internet’s medium. Now let’s talk about why internet needs to be appropriate in the public

Let’s take Taylor Swift for instance. She is huge everywhere even on the internet. She is the largest grossing female artist under 25 of all time. Her singles are jam packed with fan favorites like Back To December and 22 along with massive hits like Love Story and I Knew You Were Trouble. She has more than 8 million subscribers on her Vevo account on YouTube. She has more than 25 music videos since 2006. And, wait for it, her country music like Mean and Red. Plus, her first song from 2006 called Tim McGraw. But now, she’s moving to pop and her country music is nowhere shown in the public except for on country. So what Taylor Swift can do to make her country music shown in general public like MTV and I know where to start things off.

How about Vevo. Why? All her country songs like Ours were categorized pop on Vevo, even Tim McGraw’s number 1 2013 country single, Highway Don’t Care, is classified pop on Vevo thanks to Taylor Swift which was featured on that song. Speaking of Highway Don’t Care, I want this song on pop radio because it has Taylor Swift in it. It has nothing to do with Tim McGraw or Keith Urban, it has to do with the song itself or Taylor Swift when played on mainstream public. It needs to happen because Taylor Swift is pop and not just country. That’s why it exist on pop thanks to Vevo. So go right ahead and clicking on the link below to view this one on Vevo. Trust me, it’s awesome.

http://www.vevo.com/watch/tim-mcgraw/highway-dont-care/USCJY1318158

OK, let’s continue. Why her country songs like Sparks Fly needs to be shown on pop? For instance, all her country videos have pop banners, not country banners when played on YouTube. Plus, music’s general feelings needs to be shown on general public. That’s right, we need emotions on general public. Why? Because emotions should be joining the mainstream public and thus, something like Demi Lovato could might work while others like Carrie Underwood were somewhat struggled behind and only appear on random things and not shown on mainstream like country. It seems that music appearing on general public only appeal mainstream like pop and general public will not show music in general like country. Because well, country music is not mainstream. Only pop/rock/rap and hip-hop/edm and dance/rnb and soul is mainstream. Duh. Let’s continue.

OK, let’s get back to Taylor Swift. Shall we? This is why her country music is mainstream, not country, mainstream. I mean, why can’t her country music be mainstream? Her country music is suppose to be mainstream, but no, her mainstream has to be crossover and pop. That’s why she needs to move her country music to the mainstream public because mainstream public and country music are different. Country music like Keith Urban does not exist on mainstream public and it has to be mainstream like pop. You have to use country music department like CMT to do country music like Brad Paisley. Country music was lucky though since country music are popular music. You see, mainstream music and popular music are different. Duh. The difference between popular music and mainstream music is the lack of country music on mainstream except for crossover ones lie You Belong With Me along with mainstream miscellaneous outputs like Taylor Swift’s country music. Only most country music appear on popular music, not on mainstream.

Of course, all her country music appears on pop but only on the internet like Vevo. So we need her country music to stop played on country radio and move to pop radio. Trust me, Taylor Swift’s country singles like Mean needs to be shown on pop radio as well as random pop music stations like MTV. That and Carrie Underwood needs to be shown on the mainstream world, not country. So a Taylor Swift MTV marathon can save her country music’s medium when her country music’s medium was shown on mainstream.

Bottom line, her country music needs to be shown in general public so that way they can catch up with Taylor Swift’s pop music counterparts.

OK, I hope you like my suggestion on why I think the internet needs to save the public’s medium as long as it has to be appropriate.

So what do you think? Do you think the internet’s appropriate medium needs to be shown on general public? Would you like to see the internet playing music in public now that streaming music like Vevo and Spotify is on the rise? Do you think the internet is smart enough to be shown in general public appropriately dominating mainstream running gags? Would you like to see Taylor Swift’s country music on the mainstream public as a major request? Would you like to see emotions in music's general public sometime in the future? Sound off below!

What Really Caused Spice Girls To Collapse?

I was hoping if I could get serious and formal with all people for a minute. I’m going to stick my neck out here and confess that I love Spice Girls. While I prefer other artists that are far superior to Spice Girls like Taylor Swift, Spice Girls is awesome. But I have sincere concerns about the state of Spice Girls during the 90s thanks to late 90s and early 2000s music for ruining Spice Girls by putting in something that ruined the 90s girl group like Geri Halliwell left Spice Girls in 1998. Despite Spice Girls selling more than 55 million albums in a single decade making Spice Girls one of the most popular acts of the 20th century thanks to their number 1 smash hit 1996 single Wannabe, I just want to gain some insight from everyone here on Spice Girls's struggles during the 90s.

I loved Spice Girls's two albums from the 90s which includes 1996's Spice and 1997's Spice World because I always thought that Spice Girls would have a bright future.

But now, I get the same feeling that, in 1998, Spice Girls has severely gone downhill when Geri Halliwell left the group on May 31 of that year causing Spice Girls to struggle causing the late 90s moved on to other late 90s pop music like Backstreet Boys, NSync and Britney Spears later that year.

Undoubtedly, Spice Girls lost tons of their listeners after Geri Halliwell left the group in 1998 causing the music industry wants to forget about Spice Girls and stick with other 90s music like Mariah Carey. Spice Girls then reluctantly faded into obscurity between 1998 and 2000, as Spice Girls had to wait for 2000 to release their next album, Forever. This caused 1999 music to move on to Backstreet Boys, Christina Aguilera, Destiny's Child, Jennifer Lopez, Britney Spears and NSync. Because Spice Girls lost Geri Halliwell in 1998 causing Geri Halliwell moved to her solo career in 1999, by 1999, Spice Girls has reached rock bottom. This cause Spice Girls's third album, Forever released in November 2000 before the group has split up due to Geri Halliwell's absent causing 2000 music switched over to Britney Spears, NSync, Backstreet Boys and music from 2000 like Pink.

Because of this, Forever lost alot of money by the end of 2000 as the album sold poorly and got bad reviews as Spice Girls has split up before 2001 arrives making it the beginning of the 21st century. As 2001 enters the 21st century, Spice Girls disappeared before the 2001-2006 period arrived with music from 2001-2006 like Alicia Keys, Avril Lavigne, Kelly Clarkson, Justin Timberlake, Beyonce and Rihanna. But after 2006, luck came when 2007 enters the Spice Girls reunion. 2007 is where Spice Girls was reunite including Geri Halliwell and work on their Greatest Hits album and a new tour called The Return Of The Spice Girls Tour later in 2007. So in 2007, Spice Girls had a reunion by releasing a new tour, a Greatest Hits album and a new song called Headlines (Friendship Never Ends). So far, the Spice Girls reunion was designed to win back the entire music industry as well as their popularity including their old fans as well as new fans. But that never happened because 2007 music prefers other 2007 singles like Avril Lavigne's Girlfriend, Rihanna's Umbrella and Alicia Keys's No One. Headlines (Friendship Never Ends) was supposed to make the revived 90s girl group's comeback. But the song never caught on during fall 2007. Plus, Spice Girls couldn’t capture a wider audience with older songs like Spice Up Your Life that the group had otherwise rereleased for the 2007 Greatest Hits album.

So by the end of 2007, the Spice Girls reunion was reached a new low for Spice Girls. The 2007 Greatest Hits album flunked on the charts, Headlines (Friendship Never Ends) was a critical disaster for 2007 and Spice Girls as the song performed very poorly and it received mixed reviews and the rest of the world tour was canned despite the tour was the most successful tour since Spice World tour before the group split up again in early 2008.

It appears that the majority of the entire music industry have moved on.

You see, in terms of the general public, young people don’t seem to care for Spice Girls, and adult listeners won’t take Spice Girls seriously. Worse, Spice Girls is unable to compete against other female artists from 1995-today like Britney Spears, Beyonce, Pink, Jennifer Lopez, Alicia Keys, Kelly Clarkson, Rihanna, Lady Gaga, Miley Cyrus, Taylor Swift, Katy Perry, Nicki Minaj, Ariana Grande and Iggy Azalea.

I’m afraid that Spice Girls is facing a steady decline in relevance as the popularity of Spice Girls has greatly dwindled since 1998.

Not even the talk of the 2012 London Olympics closing ceremony and a London stage musical, Viva Forever!, can save the group in 2012. I bet Victoria Beckham along with Geri Halliwell left the group in 1998 is the reason Spice Girls was crashed by the music industry causing mainstream music to stick with other mainstream artists like Britney Spears and Miley Cyrus along with fan favorite artists like Avril Lavigne and Carrie Underwood.

Therefore-

What do you think caused Spice Girls to completely collapse?

Why has Spice Girls become has become a thing in the past while the entire music industry prefers other mainstream female artists like Britney Spears and Miley Cryus along with fan favorite ones like Shakira?

I was hoping if everyone here could be objective for a moment, and give any honest opinions on the root cause of Spice Girls's floppage.

I look forward to hearing your responses. Thank you all for listening.

I Wish Avril Lavigne Moved To Universal Next Year

You know something? This reminds me of something. I think Avril Lavigne needs to resign Sony Music Entertainment because Sony Music Entertainment can’t stand Avril Lavigne and Sony Music Entertainment only wants big names and RCA like Beyonce. That’s all Sony Music Entertainment does, big names and RCA. You see, Avril Lavigne only appeals early 2000s and Asia. It does not appeal Avril Lavigne materials in general like Under my Skin (despite the album sold well and fans love it). Worse, Sony Music Entertainment refuse to get familiar with Avril Lavigne after her career was just getting started a decade ago.

Whenever Sony Music Entertainment sees Avril Lavigne, Sony Music Entertainment refuse to accept Avril Lavigne including her ballads. That makes Avril Lavigne flipping out. It’s like Sony Music Entertainment wants more Britney Spears, Pink, Kelly Clarkson, Alicia Keys, Beyonce, Justin Timberlake, Pitbull and so on over Avril Lavigne causing Sony Music Entertainment wants to forget about Avril Lavigne and stick with big names and RCA.

Speaking of RCA, that record label is the one who ruined Avril Lavigne in the 2004-2011 period where RCA distribute Arista’s Under My Skin 10 years ago causing 2004 wants to forget about the entire Under My Skin era like Avril Lavigne performing her number 1 2004 single My Happy Ending at the 2004 MTV Video Music Awards. Worse, her far superior 2004 singles (Don’t Tell Me, My Happy Ending and Nobody’s Home) paled along with her copy and paste bratty songs from 2007 onwards like What The Hell compared to her Let Go singles from 2002 (Complicated, Sk8tr Boi, I’m With You). It looks like radio only wants Complicated and forgets her singles in general like Girlfriend and Here’s To Never Growing Up. I bet RCA affected Arista marketing Under My Skin during 2004 causing Arista unable to promote Under My Skin on its own and Under My Skin lose its publicity like 2005 Grammy nominations for Under my Skin causing Sony Music to stick with more Britney Spears and Kelly Clarkson during the mid 2000s non-stop.

I mean, why can’t radio play Avril Lavigne songs in general like He Wasn’t and Rock N Roll? I mean, her Let Go singles works perfectly thanks to The Matrix when Complicated becoming a huge hit and Sk8tr Boi has some of the strongest pop rock works during 2002. Plus, I’m With You is the most rawful Avril Lavigne yet following Losing Grip to become the most serious Avril Lavigne single to date. Even though Losing Grip did poorly in 2003. Then in 2004, RCA and Sony Music came to see Arista when Avril Lavigne working on her sophomore album and steal her second album along with Avril Lavigne herself causing RCA to milk Avril Lavigne music until 2011 when her fourth album Goodbye Lullaby lost her number 1 peaks in general and her money. RCA will never want to work with Avril Lavigne again. Goodbye Lullaby should’ve done better if it was released in 2009/2010 and not include What The Hell and Smile. That is why Avril Lavigne is the most annoying artist in the entire Sony Music industry.

Flash forward to last year where Epic Records did not have enough money for Avril Lavigne to fund her bratty songs comeback. Here’s To Never Growing Up and Rock would’ve been great Avril Lavigne songs to become bratty comeback singles. But no, Epic Records did not make enough money causing Sony Music to forget Epic Records and stick with big names and RCA like Miley Cyrus. Now her recent album lost money even more than the butchered Goodbye Lullaby. Her 2013 album has no album name and her singles lost number 1s again causing her 2013 album changed the date 3 times and released the same day going up against Eminem. Worse, she release her awful Hello Kitty song to Japan causing Give It What You Like to lost its promotion. It looks like Sony Music has moved on to big names like Britney Spears and RCA like Miley Cyrus since mid 2000s. This happens the same way to Backstreet Boys, Christina Aguilera and Carrie Underwood too.

I bet bad marketing killed Avril Lavigne’s 2004-2013 outputs like Under My Skin. I’m afraid Avril Lavigne might want to get kicked out by Sony Music Entertainment for good. That means, Sony Music will not want to work with Avril Lavigne. Now Avril Lavigne lost money and making new music thanks to Sony Music for killing her music or her career after the Let Go era.

So what Avril Lavigne can do now is to move to Universal Records after Epic Records released her Christmas album which is coming by the end of this year called Christmas Day. Now, I’ll talk about Universal later. Right now, I’ll be talking about Avril Lavigne’s upcoming sixth album Christmas Day. Now, as you may know that Christmas Day will be Avril Lavigne’s first Christmas album and her sixth album which will be coming this holiday season after Taylor Swift releasing her fifth album, 1989. Christmas Day will include her Christmas songs along with her Christmas single, Totally Merry. It want planned to be released this summer from what I heard, but due to bad marketing and that awful Hello Kitty, Totally Merry has pushed back to this October/November-ish. I bet Sony Music like RCA and bratty songs like The Best Damn Thing cause Avril Lavigne’s marketing to collapse causing Avril Lavigne unable to compete against other female artists from today and yesterday like Britney Spears, Pink, Kelly Clarkson, Beyonce, Rihanna, Miley Cyrus and Ariana Grande.

It looks like music only wants big names like Britney Spears and mainstream like One Direction rather than good quality music like Taylor Swift (despite Taylor Swift sold more records and made more money than Avril Lavigne making Taylor Swift one of the biggest female artists of the 21 century). America is very lazy in the music industry. America music wants nothing but big names like Micheal Jackson and mainstream/fads like Justin Bieber over Avril Lavigne.

Anyway, back to Christmas Day. It will likely to be the last Avril Lavigne album released by Sony. It will charted at the holiday Billboard chart when it debut at number 1 on that chart along with number 4/5 at the Billboard Top 200 Albums charts making it her first number 1 album since The Best Damn Thing. That would be good giving a good late 2014 date for Christmas Day unlike the awful November date Epic Records chose for her last year’s album. So have Avril Lavigne announced her Christmas album this fall (mostly September/October) and released her Christmas album on October/November. I would say November might be a better date since Taylor Swift’s 1989 album will get and October date. So November would be a good release date for the Christmas Day album along with its single Totally Merry just in time for the holidays.

After Christmas Day, she will move to Universal Records next year so she can work on her seventh album. This will be her first album not made my Sony but rather Universal. So I’ll be talking about a good Universal label that works well for Avril Lavigne.

So how about Island Def Jam. Rihanna used to work there in 2005-2013. But now, she moved to another label that was owned by Jay Z giving Avril Lavigne an extra edge to work on Island Def Jam. This is where she can work on her rock/pop album with a more mature route and serious explicit writing. That would be something that Avril Lavigne will want to try out.

Another label that works well is Big Machine Records. This is where Taylor Swift gets to be Big Machine’s major staple. So have Avril Lavigne worked with Scott Borchetta who worked with Taylor Swift because Taylor Swift can handledly compete against Avril Lavigne thanks to better marketing and better radio plays and better digital sales. So have Avril Lavigne release a serious single with a more mature route instead of bratty songs and have that Avril Lavigne single to have a truckload of airplays on the radio and make quick bucks by selling over 1 million digital sales during the first few weeks. Scott Borchetta or even Taylor Swift will be very happy if Big Machine Records sees this. So Big Machine Records would be perfect for Avril Lavigne so that way Big machine Records will get rid of country music and replace with pop music like Christina Aguilera in Nashville.

My next and probably final thought is Interscope Records. Interscope Records is home of Lady Gaga and her hilarious sexy songs like Telephone and applause. Since Lady Gaga can easily compete Avril Lavigne and defeat Avril Lavigne, Interscope would fit nicely for Avril Lavigne. An Avril Lavigne website called Avril Bandaids does random forums regarding of why Avril Lavigne needs Interscope Records and that give me an advice. Interscope works perfectly for Avril Lavigne so that way Avril Lavigne can have better chance to make her music more successful compared to Sony Music.

There you go those will be the choices for Universal labels that Avril Lavigne deserves. That’s why Universal Records is far superior to Sony Music Entertainment. I’ll take Big Machine Records over RCA and Epic Records any way. So when Avril Lavigne turns 30, she will no longer making anymore bratty songs so that way she will move to a more mature rout where it's pop rock or even rock. So her first future Universal album has to contain no bratty songs at all.

So what do you think? What do you think will happen if Avril Lavigne moved to Universal Records next year? What do you think of Avril Lavigne moved to Universal so she can work on her pop/rock with more mature route instead of bratty songs? Sound off below!

How About An Avril Lavigne Album Without Bratty Songs

Hey there, Avril Lavigne readers. I’ll be talking about a new Avril Lavigne album for next year. As you may know that 2010s is a very difficult decade for Avril Lavigne. Avril Lavigne making new music still only have bratty songs and Japan. America hates Avril Lavigne like Girlfriend. Fans still only like Let Go/Under My Skin and Avril Lavigne is huge in the public still only have Let Go era/Girlfriend. Arista is gone. Sony Music is moving away from Avril Lavigne and only wants big names and RCA like Britney Spears and Miley Cyrus respectively. RCA/Epic Records ruined Avril Lavigne songs after 2002. Even digital age/internet doesn't help either. Bratty songs ruined Avril Lavigne singles. Why Avril Lavigne lead singles that isn’t bratty only have Don’t Tell Me? Don’t Tell Me would've been a perfect lead single for Under My Skin because Don’t Tell Me is not a bratty song. But no, RCA prevents Don’t Tell Me to peak at number 1 on any Billboard chart in 2004. I’ll tell you why Sony Music is destroying Avril Lavigne. Let me guess, 2004. That’s right, 2004 is where Sony Music is moving away from Avril Lavigne causing Sony Music to moved on to big names like Justin Timberlake and RCA like Kelly Clarkson forcing her second album Under My Skin to unable to be shown in the music public in 2004, not Girlfriend. Now let’s talk about why 2004 is one the weaker years for Avril Lavigne.

Under My Skin is where RCA controls Arista’s Avril Lavigne’s market over Arista and Avril Lavigne in 2004 causing Under My Skin to be poorly marketed. Under My Skin was originally made by Arista Records in 2004. It was going to be an epic Avril Lavigne album because it was her second album and her album that fans loved in 2004, and it showed that Avril Lavigne wanted to break away from bratty songs that plagued Complicated and Skater Boy and even Losing Grip during the Let Go era.

It would've been perfect, coming off of Let Go during 2002. Shirts that said "No Bratty Songs. Yes Mature Songs." were worn by Arista during production in 2003. This was shaping up to be Avril Lavigne’s most ambitious album yet. Something Avril Lavigne would've made. What happened? Well, Arista and Avril Lavigne was dictated by RCA and Sony Music’s executives. RCA manufactured the album causing Arista unable to manufacture the album on its own, and Under My Skin turned out to be a mess. It couldn't appeal to music public in 2004. It was perceived as too explicit for kids (even though this happened in Don’t Tell Me and My Happy Ending), her singles which are better than her 2007-present bratty singles did horrible compared to her Let Go singles and feels more like a post 2002 album rather than a sophomore Avril Lavigne album because the album wasn't mature enough for people in 2004. Worse, 2004 music hates Under My Skin and 2004 music only likes other 2004 music like Lean Back. Overall, Under My Skin was a big mess. Even with positive reviews from the critics, Under my Skin paled along with The Best Damn Thing/Goodbye Lullaby/2013 Avril Lavigne album compared to Let Go. Even the success of Under My Skin and fans loved the album couldn't saved the album’s public during 2004. Worse, He Wasn’t did not release a music video in 2005 in the US. That’s why the Let Go era and Girlfriend is better than Under My Skin. OK, let’s continue.

I understand why music listeners are very proud of other artists that are better than Avril Lavigne like Taylor Swift based on the works for the general public and majors A-List artists like Katy Perry because unlike Avril Lavigne, other artists are not spoiled brat and treat their music very well. Avril Lavigne doesn't. That’s why other artists are doing better than Avril Lavigne even in the mid to late 2000s. That’s why her public image is a spoiled brat. Bu the problem is that Avril Lavigne is shy, not a spoiled brat. The reason she makes bratty songs is that she is shy, not a spoiled brat. So unfortunately, they never realize how many songs which are better than today’s popular music like Miley Cyrus are usually banned and aren't considered as singles, that is why people haven't got noticed other amazing songs out of every single album from 2004-today which includes Slipped Away and Fall To Pieces from Under My Skin; Innocence, One Of Those Girls, Contagious, Runaway from The Best Damn Thing; Darlin, Remember When, Not Enough from Goodbye Lullaby; Give You What You Like, Falling Fast, 17 from her fifth album. All we could blame is the label they made bad single decision to the singles. Yet, other artists like Sia has been free to choose what the singles she exactly wants. It looks like Sony Music will have to forget about Avril Lavigne and only wants big names and RCA. Universal Records did that and so does EMI Records. Why Avril Lavigne won’t so the same thing? I mean, Sony Music needs to stop marketing big names and RCA and market Sony Music in general like Arista and Carrie Underwood.

Don't ever say Avril Lavigne writing in worse coz I'm sure she's been skilled, just listening to Remember When, Darlin, Stop Standing There, Falling Fast, those single-worthy tracks. However, her label just screw all of them, it doesn't mean those songs not existed.

For the materials wrote for other pop singers, I know Sia is professional at it, at the same time, I believe Avril Lavigne could handle that job perfectly. The production idea of How You Remind Me was from Avril Lavigne. A person could think of that way to recreate a song to be such matched with the vibe itself and surprising, not got to the negative to the job. So it seems that RCA and Epic Records made a bad single decision to the 2004-2011 singles and the 2013 singles respectively because RCA and Epic Records just screw all Avril Lavigne singles after the Let Go era. Remember, Avril Lavigne just doesn't want to write songs for others, it doesn't mean that she can't. That’s what Taylor Swift is for. When she promise to do that, it usually turns out great as Alice and Keep Holding On as well as the Let Go singles (Complicated, Sk8er Boi, I’m With You and Losing Grip).

So I was thinking, instead of making more bratty singles, what if Avril Lavigne's singles on the next album only have bratty-less singles and not making next album's bratty singles. You know something? That's a great idea. Avril Lavigne can make an album without bratty songs. But the singles has to be songs that aren't bratty and not considered singles. Yeah, that would be good. All Avril Lavigne has to do now is to release a non-bratty song that ins't a single and marketed as a single without Epic promoting it and have the single that isn't a single and lacked a bratty single in it to sell very well and might even played well on the radio. It will also have the ability to become her number 1 single comeback because that Avril Lavigne single has to be a number 1 single. If Avril Lavigne can make a mature rock song and it needs a crossover for pop radio, have Max Martin produce it so that way her rock single will be crossover friendly for radio and have that crossover single to be her number 1 single. Let's hope the next album has to not include bratty songs and only have bratty songs-less songs. That way, her next album will only have bratty songs-less song no less.

What I wish would happen: Avril Lavigne finally gets full creative control after moving to a new label. She continues in the direction started with her last year’s album: More self-written introspective songs and indie rock jams, along with some fresh new sounds for her. More rock and less pop, more mature and less bratty, more adult contemporary than desperate teen pop. No bratty songs and it has to be number 1 singles. All 5 of her singles do well, her album sells millions, and best of all, she gets real critical respect. Critics are impressed by her growth and artistry, and she FINALLY earns her first Grammy award. This flawless 6th album paves the way for a strong career that includes more lauded and popular albums that continue to show what she's really capable of - musically, vocally, and in terms of songwriting. (Also, she learns how to put on a better concert consistently: Not just singles, more album tracks, changing up how she plays songs, and better crowd interaction.) One more thing, it has to be a rock album and it better have artist collaborations like Demi Lovato. No more bratty songs and bring back Max Martin. Have Max Martin worked with Avril Lavigne a bit for her rock singles that needs crossover for pop radio. The songs has to be different experiments of punk rock music with emotions and good storytelling.

Anyway, without bratty songs, it can save Avril Lavigne’s medium. Since general public will never want to accept Avril Lavigne making bratty songs again forcing her today’s bratty songs unable to compete against mainstream populars like Britney Spears and electronic techno pop, now is the time for Avril Lavigne to move away from bratty songs and move to a more mature route.

I mean, well, it seems that anyone that says Avril Lavigne hasn't evolved since Let Go, that she shows no maturity, and that her lyrics are vapid and meaningless obviously has no clue what they're talking about. Even with the success of Under My Skin in 2004, Sony Music is getting tired of Avril Lavigne and she does music her own way. This happens the same way Spice Girls did back in the 90s. Like Avril Lavigne, Spice Girls was not popular in the public and only appeal decade music tastes. While Spice Girls only appeal 90s music, Avril Lavigne wasn’t popular after the Let Go era despite fans loved Under My Skin and Girlfriend is her number 1 single of 2007. I guess music only wants big name populars like Britney Spears and today’s music like Justin Bieber and forget Spice Girls and Avril Lavigne. Worse, music public refuse to market Spice Girls, Avril Lavigne or even country music like Luke Byran in the music public. Even with internet, America music only wants America populars like Pink and Kelly Clarkson as well as mainstream populars like One Direction. That’s why America music does not care about Spice Girls/Avril Lavinge/country music. America music only wants mainstream populars like Rihanna. The only way is inventions. So you can't judge an artist or an album based just on the singles or the image of the artist. If these people ACTUALLY listened to Avril Lavigne's music, it would be obvious that she's evolved a lot and that she has plenty of very mature songs. Goodbye Lullaby is almost all mature introspective songs, and her fifth album has its fair share of songs that demonstrate her musical and artistic growth. If Arista is still around then there’s no need for RCA/Epic Records to bother Avril Lavigne.

I mean, why did RCA and Epic coerce Avril Lavigne to go back into the studio for "hit material" when they had no intentions of giving her adequate promo in the first place? Why did RCA and Epic coerce her to go back into the studio for "hit material" when they had no intentions of giving her adequate promo in the first place for her 2004-2011 era singles and modern era singles respectively? The thought of it scares me.

Worse, because after her first album album she switched to RCA when her second album was released in 2004 before RCA forced her to switch to water-down pop songs.

Her authenticity was already mocked during her first era, where she was bashed in rock circles for being a poser after Skater Boy and Complicated’s releases. This was in 2002/2003 when rock was ruling at pop, and most fans of the genre were rather bourgeois. Good thing I’m With You saves the say during Christmas 2002 and thus, Complicated, Skater Boy and I’m With You works perfectly as the 2002 singles unlike her 2004-present singles like My Happy Ending (despite My Happy Ending is her number 1 single of 2004) and What The Hell. Heck, even Girlfriend works well too as a 2007 Avril Lavigne singles unlike fans hated Girlfriend. So I’ll take Complicated, Skater Boy, I’m With You and Girlfriend over 2004-present singles like Nobody’s Home, Smile and Hello Kitty any day.

That’s why first album felt more true, but after it, it was difficult to take her seriously in 2004 despite the second album felt more true because she didn't seem to. So the massive talent that is Avril Lavigne has been viewed as a joke by some for a minute since 2004 thanks to RCA for ruining her 2004 album alongside Girlfriend lost her fans.

So what I think is that Avril Lavigne would be more successful and respected - particularly with her last two albums - if the singles had actually represented the records as a whole. Avril Lavigne's music is a lot better than some misguidedly bratty singles would suggest. It annoys me how most of Avril Lavigne's haters don't even know her music. Plus, Avril Lavigne was more into her long career than breaking records. So Avril Lavigne fits very nicely as a long running career. The same applies to other artists like Eminem and Rihanna.

So have Avril Lavigne to make a song from the next album that isn't bratty and single and released it to the radio and digital shops as a single without Epic Records promoting it. Epic Records can get the job well done because Epic Records doesn't promote the singles or albums. This could be at a risk because labels hates Epic Records and only prefer other labels like RCA. I want Avril Lavigne to take a risk on a single that is not suppose to be a single and have a so-called non-bratty single to be a lead single on her next album. Have that single released on the public radio quietly. Beyonce did that on her visual album back in December. So Avril Lavigne will have to get her number 1 successes back. Fans are believing her and she has to get be positive publicity back. Have all her singles not bratty and not really singles but rather her songs that are not singles. The next album's lead single doesn't have a bratty song formula and it might save her music industry. This will have the potential to debut at number 1 on ITunes and sold like say 300k-400k digital copies and make that single a big success. This will allow Avril Lavigne to try something new each time instead of making copy and paste bratty singles non-stop. This has to be a success and it has to her first number 1 lead single since 2007's Girlfriend.

If Epic Records isn’t working, she can resign her dreadful Sony label and that awful Epic Records and moved to Universal and have it the same way I mentioned earlier.

So Avril Lavigne will have to put away her spoiled brat image, her bratty singles are packed, her copy and paste unsuccessful/water-down bratty songs like What The Hell will become obsolete and her bratty materials like Smile were put away. Bratty songs are now a thing in the past for Avril Lavigne. With a great mature image, her next album will become a new success and Avril Lavigne will reinvent herself as a designated punk rock song-writer. That would be awesome.

So what do you think? Are you excited for a new Avril Lavigne album that doesn't have any bratty songs? Are you happy for Avril Lavigne to stop making her bratty songs and try something new each time? Sound off below!

Where's Avril Lavigne's Number 1's, 2010's Decade

Hello, Avril Lavigne listeners. I'll be talking about why Avril Lavigne lost her number 1 singles since Girlfriend. I hope you enjoy it.

I think that Avril Lavigne needs a 2010s number 1 single really badly. 2010s was a difficult decade for Avril Lavigne for not having any 2010s number 1s at all. RCA killed 2011's Goodbye Lullaby era and Epic Records killed Avril Lavigne's 2013 outputs like Let Me Go. Avril Lavigne should've done a better job if Arista Records is still around. Arista is much better label for Avril than RCA or Epic. RCA and Epic ruined Avril Lavigne's materials after 2002. Let's take a look.

For instance, Avril Lavigne's Max Martin song, What The Hell, should be a perfect Avril Lavigne song to have a comeback. Right? Nope. What The Hell released in 2011. But I think 2011 is a terrible date for What The Hell. 2010 is a much better date for that song. The same applies to Smile, Wish You Were Here, and her fourth album, Goodbye Lullaby. What The Hell should peak at number 1. But no, that song did not peaked at number 1. Why? RCA and terrible marketing. RCA made Avril Lavigne had trouble having her songs peaked at number 1 on any Billboard chart. What is RCA thinking? Whatever happened to Let Go and Artista? Now it's just RCA and modern crap. I'm sick of today's outputs and RCA. The only way is inventions. Let's continue.

You know Avril Lavigne's 2004 sophmore album Under My Skin released 10 years ago. Right? Well, not really. RCA killed Arista's Under My Skin in 2004 and her discography started to get really bad when her sophomore album, which is Under My Skin, was released in 2004. I know fans loved the 2004 album. But I think that 2004 is where music started to treat Avril Lavigne the wrong way even on her post Let Go ballads or her hit sophomore album, Under My Skin. RCA is a nightmare for Avril Lavigne in the 2004/2007/2011 era. Even after the RCA is over, Epic Records ruined her 2013 comeback outputs like Here's To Never Growing Up by putting in bad marketing explicit writing and Martin Johnson. The modern era acted the same way the RCA did back in 2004-2011. What is American music industry thinking?

So what we need to get Avril Lavigne's number 1 America sucesses back is to release a new lead single that might be a real Avril Lavigne comeback for next year, not the bratty punk rock crap and have that single peak at number 1 on US ITunes in the US Digital Songs chart by selling let's say 400k-500k digital copies and have it stayed for like 2-3 weeks tying in the premiere of her next year’s music video on Vevo by the time next year arrived. That way, a 2015 Avril Lavigne song will attract her US fans better than what Hello Kitty did since Hello Kitty only appeals Japanese tastes. Let’s continue.

If Hello Kitty needs to be number 1, then it can. Hello Kitty needs to be number 1 on the dance Billboard chart. I don't care if people hated Hello Kitty and stick with Let Go/Under My Skin. Hello Kitty needs to be number 1 on any Billboard chart. So if that's the case, Hello Kitty and Give It What You Like needs to be number 1 hits on any Billboard charts. Hello Kitty needs to peak at number 1 on US Hot Dance Songs chart. Let Me Go doesn't save her music industry last year thanks to mixed reviews and bad marketing for killing Let Me Go. Not the song itself. Hello Kitty should’ve been perfect for worldwide. But no, that song was never heard on the mainstream and the only way is Japan. Not even Vevo mentioned this song. Worse, it got bad reviews from the critics and the song peaked at number 75 on Hot 100 chart. I guess 2010s hates 2010s Avril Lavigne like Here’s To Never Growing Up and 2010s only wants other 2010s music like One Direction. What is Avril Lavigne thinking?

Another problem is that people hated Hello Kitty. I mean, why Hello Kitty was outraged by people? Why people hate Avril Lavigne's Hello Kitty? Why people miss the Let Go/Under My Skin era? First of all, there's no such thing as I miss the Let Go/Under My Skin era. To me, Let Go is fine, but Under My Skin feels more like a post 2002 Avril Lavigne album than a sophomore album. In my opinion, there are far better sophomore albums like Taylor Swift's Fearless than Under My Skin. Compared to other sophomore albums like Spice World, or even her 2002 debut album Let Go, Under My Skin is far weaker. Plus, Under My Skin has a built in RCA to scare off Avril Lavigne's music listeners and prevent the Under My Skin era to have a Grammy nomination in 2005 at the 2005 Grammys. So if you think you miss Under My Skin from 10 years ago, then I hope you're happy. So here's what happens, after Arista finished making Under My Skin 10 years ago, RCA came in and distribute Under My Skin. RCA cut the best Avril Lavigne album that fans and critics praised in 2004 by turning in Under My Skin's serious bratty songs into quick cash-in ballads causing Under My Skin to be difficult to be shown in the music public in 2004 along with poor singles selections and explicit writing. Overall, Under My Skin turned out to be a mess. The only Under My Skin bratty song is He Wasn't and only 3 singles (Don't Tell Me, My Happy Ending and Nobody's Home) released in the US and not He Wasn't. 2004 music don't care about Under My Skin. Avril Lavigne doesn't perform My Happy Ending at the 2004 MTV VMA despite Don't Tell Me has a nomination. Worse, no Grammy nominations for Under My Skin in 2005. This is why RCA is a bad label for Under My Skin. Arista should market Under My Skin because it was made by the same label who made Let Go. But no, RCA held Under My Skin Back. Overall, Under My Skin era is a complete mess. That's why other 2004 music like Kelly Clarkson's Since U Been Gone as well as the Let Go era is better than Under My Skin. That's why 2004 is a weak year for Avril Lavigne.

Under My Skin was lucky however. It become her first number 1 album in 2004 unlike Let Go selling nearly 10 million copies worldwide making it her second best selling album of all time. My Happy Ending is her number 1 single of 2004 becoming her third most played song on the radio. But the way Under My Skin was marketed is not what RCA marketed from 10 years ago. Overall, there are far better albums including her own Let Go album than Under My Skin along with The Best Damn Thing and Goodbye Lullaby. OK, Under My Skin is done. Let's get back to Hello Kitty. Shall we? Anyway, as you may know that Hello Kitty has gained over 50 million views on YouTube and Vevo which is pretty good for an Avril Lavigne music video. Let's hope Hello Kitty was sent to US dance radio stations so it can peak at number at number one on the US Hot Dance Songs chart this year. Avril Lavigne needs a 2010s number 1 single and Hello Kitty is perfect for peaking at number 1 on any Billboard chart. But no, that song wasn’t play on mainstream radio it was only played in Japan. Why can’t America be Avril Lavigne’s target audience? If Avril Lavigne’s label is Universal instead of Sony, then Avril Lavigne’s post 2002 materials should’ve market better in America. Oh yeah, one more thing, it's OK for you to not enjoy Hello Kitty. But people bashing Hello Kitty is not gonna make Hello Kitty popular on the radio. So just ignore Hello Kitty so you can prefer Let Go or the miguided album Under My Skin from the 2004-2011 era and you'll be fine. Is that easy? OK, let's talk about why Hello Kitty is taking a risk but end up doing well this year. Or it didn’t. I guess America music only wants repeat mainstreams like Miley Cyrus and twerking.

So as you may know that Hello Kitty is similar to the post 2002 Avril Lavigne songs of the 2004-2011 era, but it most likely won't be plagued with the problems that plagued them. Those songs were produced when RCA executives had their way. Read up on all the horror stories. An Avril Lavigne song called He Wasn't from her sophmore album, Under My Skin, was being cut from Under My Skin's singles selection in 2005 because the music department at test screenings got antsy for not releasing He Wasn't's music video on MTV in 2005, the decision to throw RCA and explicit writing into My Happy Ending in 2004 causing that 2004 song to get rejected by the radio in 2004 after it peaked at number 1 on Top 40 Mainstream and played more than 80 million times on the radio causing that Avril Lavigne song to unable to compete against other 2004 songs like Since U Been Gone, RCA killed Arista's Under My Skin (Avril Lavigne's second album from 2004) causing that album to pale along with its singles like Don't Tell Me compared to 2002's Let Go era despite selling almost 3 million copies in the US and fans loved the album, the various cuts done to her third album, The Best Damn Thing like no Keep Holding On music video, fans hated Girlfriend in 2007 despite Girlfriend peaked at number 1 on Billboard Hot 100 in 2007 and the butchering of Goodbye Lullaby (Avril Lavigne's 4th album in 2011)... The list goes on. Now that the RCA era is over, Epic Records and LA Reid don't have to worry about this. No more pandering Avril Lavigne songs to people who doesn't care about Avril Lavigne, no attempts to make an Avril Lavigne song more appealing to music listeners who never heard of Avril Lavigne rather than fans. Avril Lavigne is following footsteps of another artist like Madonna and Taylor Swift, allowing Avril Lavigne to create great songs for all ages without having to pander to any particular audience.

This is why Avril Lavigne's recent outputs is superior to a majority of her music released between 2004 and 2011. I'll take Here's To Never Growing Up, Rock N Roll and Let Me Go over Don't Tell Me, My Happy Ending, Nobody's Home, Girlfriend, When You're Gone, Hot, The Best Damn Thing, What The Hell, Smile and Wish You Were Here any day. So let's get back to Hello Kitty. Shall we? Now, if you think you hate Hello Kitty, then go ahead and bash Hello Kitty all you want. But Avril Lavigne worked so hard on her Hello Kitty music video because the music video takes place in Japan. Avril Lavigne loves Japan. So that's why Japan is a perfect country for Avril Lavigne. But cheer up you guys. She will be releasing her first Christmas music video to Vevo towards the end of this year just in time for the holidays. So Hello Kitty can make a great filler for an Avril Lavigne single. So let's hope Hello Kitty would be perfect Avril Lavigne songs for US radio stations. Hello Kitty better peak at number 1 on the US Billboard charts. Any US Billboard chart will do the trick this year. Dance Songs chart might be better though.

Unfortunately, nobody heard of Hello Kitty. Even internet like Vevo doesn’t help either. I mean, why can’t internet dominate the music industry? I’m sick of radio. We need internet Billboard chart. Perect for Avril Lavigne songs like Hello Kitty. They should’ve done a better job if Hello Kitty is on a dance hits mix rather than in an Avril Lavigne album. So, forget Hello Kitty and have Avril Lavigne’s next single will be slated for next year instead of Hello Kitty. Hello Kitty can make a great filler for Avril Lavigne singles. But have her next album to be different from her copy and paste bratty singles. So here’s why.

If Avril Lavigne’s next album has no bratty singles, then it’s fine. But I think Avril Lavigne needs to move away from bratty songs/Japan/Epic Records/Sony/Martin Johnson/Hello Kitty and moved on to a more mature route unlike the misguided Under My Skin, that annoying The Best Damn Thing, the butchered Goodbye Lullaby or her messy recent album without an album’s name containing a bad Hello Kitty song. 2004-2013 is a very difficult decade for Avril Lavigne thanks to Sony for ruining Avril Lavigne by putting in crap like RCA and Hello Kitty. If her next lead single is not bratty and marks the departure of bratty music causing that lead single to be considered rock with good storytelling with a touch of something like Max Martin and made by a good replaced label like Universal instead of RCA/Epic Records, then chances are, it might even peak at number 1 on Hot 100 chart. If a lead single is produced by Max Martin and not considered bratty but instead a rock lead single with a touch of bubblegum pop, then that lead single will peak at number 1 on Hot 100 chart and it might be a big win for Max Martin and Avril Lavigne. That would be a good thing.

If her next album doesn’t have any bratty songs, confirmed to be her first 100% rock album and produced by Max Martin, then this will be a win for Avril Lavigne. Taylor Swift did that on her 2012 single, We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together. This year, her 2014 lead single Shake It Off topped the Billboard Hot 100 chart again. If Taylor Swift can do that, so can Avril Lavigne.

OK, I hope you like my comments about why Avril Lavigne needs her number 2010's singles for next year.

So what do you think? Do you think that awful hello Kitty needs to be played on dance radio this year? Do you think her first 2010s number 1 single might be perfect for next year instead of Hello Kitty? Sound off below!